Ah, 1997. A pivotal year in the history of chess, and for the relationship between humans and machines. That year, the reigning world chess champion, Garry Kasparov, faced off against Deep Blue, a powerful chess-playing computer developed by IBM.
It was a historic match, watched by millions around the world. Kasparov had already defeated Deep Blue in a previous match in 1996, but this time, Deep Blue came back stronger.
The six-game match was tense and closely contested. In the end, Deep Blue emerged victorious, winning 3.5 to 2.5. This was the first time a computer had ever defeated a reigning world chess champion in a standard tournament match.
The victory of Deep Blue was a major milestone in the development of artificial intelligence. It showed that computers could not only learn and play complex games like chess, but they could even beat the best human players in the world.
The match also sparked a lot of debate about the nature of intelligence and creativity. Some people argued that Deep Blue’s victory meant that machines could now be considered intelligent. Others argued that Deep Blue was simply a very good pattern-matching machine, and that it did not have any real understanding of the game of chess.
Regardless of your interpretation, the 1997 match between Kasparov and Deep Blue was a watershed moment in history. It showed the power of artificial intelligence, and it raised important questions about the future of humanity in a world where machines are becoming increasingly intelligent.
Here are some additional details about the match:
- The match was played in New York City from February 10 to May 11, 1997.
- Each game was played with a time control of 120 minutes for the first 40 moves, then 60 minutes for the next 20 moves, then 15 minutes for the rest of the game, with a 30-second increment per move from move 61.
- Deep Blue was a parallel supercomputer with a peak performance of 230.5 GFLOPS. It was housed in a room with air conditioning set to 68°F (20°C) and humidity control set to 50%.
- Kasparov accused IBM of cheating during the match, but his claims were never substantiated.
I hope this information is helpful! Let me know if you have any other questions.